Injured Sehwag on way home, Dhoni a little hurt

The Board of Control for Cricket in India confirmed on Tuesday that Virender Sehwag would play no further part in the tournament, but the announcement came after the matter had snowballed into a full-blown controversy.

The BCCI press release said that the opener, who missed the two warm-up games as well as India’s 25-run victory over Bangladesh on Sunday, would return to India after consulting with specialists in England. Dinesh Karthik was named as his replacement.

Sehwag batted in the nets for the first time on this trip today, but his outing lasted just 12 deliveries, before he walked back into the changing rooms at the Lady’s Bay ground.

To read the full article, click here..
To read the ePaper, visit: http://epaper.indianexpress.com/

How times have changed

“The BCCI members had resolved in a working committee meeting recently that they were not happy with the Twenty20 version and will not play it.” This was Board of Control for Cricket in India president Sharad Pawar’s stance three years ago, when the Indian team’s participation in the inaugural edition of the World Twenty20 championship itself was in doubt.

Back then, the bigwigs in the board considered the format a bit of a joke. England might have needed T20 to “bring crowds back to the grounds” but India did not, was the general theme (and anyway, they whispered, the fast-paced nature of the game, with just a 10-minute break, didn’t lend itself to advertising revenue).

As Mahendra Singh Dhoni and his team prepare to start their title defence, it’s hard not to chuckle at how, and how much, the board’s posturing on the game’s shortest format has changed.

To read the full article, click here..
To read the ePaper, visit: http://epaper.indianexpress.com

IPL windfall? Taxman knocks cricket board's door for service tax

To examine service tax liability, the Central Board of Excise and Customs has asked its regional commissioners to examine all contracts the BCCI has entered on or behalf of the Indian Premier League with all corporate bodies who have either bid for teams or are providing services from entertainment to broadcasting to advertising.

A fortnight ago, Director General of Service Tax (DGST) told field functionaries to collate findings on "relevant facts, the views regarding taxability of such activities, the amount of service tax involved, the amount of tax dues collected, if any" to be reported to him.

Under the franchise model, a sponsor owmng a team pays a stipulated fee to the BCCI to get ownership. The franchisees have to pay 10 percent of the bid amount every year to BCCI, as a franchisee fee.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://epaper.indianexpress.com